Gay spy in toilet

Police were then contacted and the defendant was arrested. Made me jump. The incident occurred at a McDonald's restaurant in Liverpool city centre pictured. In London, in the pubs, it's usual. AND FESTIVAL. He then makes his way over to the women's bathroom and finds himself in the cubicle opposite the door of the toilets the victim would enter after him.

A voyeur claimed he thought Britain allowed the LGBTQ community to use all toilets after he was arrested for spying on a woman in a ladies lavatory. Plumber Ivan Blidar, 37, was detained for. Bruh, why is you on tha flo? When the camera whipped to the right and a guy was laying on a gross bathroom floor the whole time, I legit jumped.

He said he was not interested in girls. Prosecutor Andrew Sinker said: 'The defendant has also gone into the female toilets and whilst the complainant was in the toilet she looked up and saw a male looking over the cubicle at her. He claimed he had previously used both the ladies and the gents without issue and added that it was 'usual' for men to go into women's toilets in London where he has lived for six years.

Plumber Ivan Blidar pictured outside Sefton Magistrates Court was detained for voyeurism offences after he was caught peeking at the victim over the cubicle wall of a public toilet.

How Queer People Found : Crime & Justice Gay sex sting in public toilet results in arrests One man says he was arrested just for wearing a Pride bracelet in the restroom and was called a slur by cops

He believed there was nobody in there but whilst inside the cubicle he heard the two women had come in. At 4am, a woman - who cannot be named - went to the toilet with a female friend whilst visiting McDonald's in the city centre following a night out.

A voyeur claimed he thought Britain allowed the LGBTQ community to use all toilets after he was arrested for spying on a woman in a ladies lavatory. But a district judge at Sefton Magistrates Court rejected Blidar's account as 'not credible' and convicted him of observing a person doing a private act.

Whilst in there, she looked up and saw the defendant looking over the cubicle at her. He was peering over the wall and watching me. If you're interested in screening the film, send an email to (at) :) more. When quizzed by police over his actions, bearded Bildar said he identified as a woman, was homosexual and insisted people of 'non-traditional sexual orientation' in the UK had a 'choice' of toilets to use.

A district judge at Sefton Magistrates Court pictured rejected Blidar's account as 'not credible' and convicted him of observing a person doing a private act. CCTV showed Blidar initially heading towards the men's toilet, but he does not push the door or go in.

The woman, who is in her 20s, said: 'I sat down on the toilet and then looked up and I could see a man staring at me on the toilet.

Plumber Ivan Blidar, 37, was detained for voyeurism offences after he was caught peeking at the victim over the cubicle wall at a McDonald's restaurant in Liverpool city centre. In evidence he claimed he had only peered over the cubicle wall as he believed the women were doing cocaine in the toilet.

I am gay and I think I could choose which toilet I use. I def would've screamed if some dude popped his head under the divider. But I always check first if someone is in there first. I got up off the toilet and walked. When asked if he understood that there was a female toilet and a male toilet, he said that he had 'understood that he had a choice as he was a homosexual'.

After being arrested, Blidar told officers he had originally gone to the male toilets 'but it was busy and there was a queue'. Speaking through a Russian translator, Blidar added: 'As far as I am aware there is no law in this country that would forbid women from using the male toilets and males using the female toilets.

After being arrested, Blidar pictured outside court told officers he had originally gone to the male toilets 'but it was busy and there was a queue'. The defendant was then asked if he understood that there was a female toilet and a male toilet but the defendant responded that he had understood that he had a choice as he was a homosexual.

Lol right.